Legal Opinion
Tatum v. Garceau
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 18, 2025No. 1:25-cv-01358Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN SEAN T. TATUM, Petitioner, v. Case No. 25-CV-1358 KEVIN GARCEAU, Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER Sean T. Tatum filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court screened his petition and noted that it appeared both that his petition was untimely and that it contained at least one unexhausted claim. (ECF No. 4.) The court ordered Tatum to explain why his petition should not be dismissed. Tatum has responded (ECF No. 6), and having reviewed his response the court finds that it is required to dismiss his petition. Tatum does not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.