Legal Opinion
Schlessinger v. Valspar Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 28, 2011No. 10 CV 2694(DRH)(ETB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HURLEY, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, bring this diversity action1 alleging breach of contract and violations of New York’s General Business Law (“GBL”) § 349. (Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 33^40.) Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The following factual allegations are taken from the complaint and presumed true for the purposes of this motion.
This dispute arises from defendant’s allegedly premature…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Abraham v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Whitehaven S.F., LLC v. SpanglerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Schlessinger v. Valspar Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Lamm v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Schlessinger v. Valspar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.