Legal Opinion
Plaintiffs v. Defendants
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 18, 2025No. 1:25-cv-02270Unknown
1Opinion
Hon. Arun Subramanian United States District Court Southern District of New York Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Rule 37.2 Conference Regarding Discovery Disputes (Civ. No. 1:25-cv-02270-AS) Dear Judge Subramanian: We represent the Plaintiffs in the above-referenced matters. Pursuant to Local Rule 37.2 and Section 5 of your Honor’s individual rules, Plaintiffs write respectfully to request a pre-motion conference to address discovery disputes and Plaintiffs’ anticipated motion to compel. On August 1, 2025,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sage Realty Corp. v. Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Crosby v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Cohalan v. Genie Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- DeNicola v. Frontline Asset StrategiesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012