DeNicola v. Frontline Asset Strategies

ORDER

WALL, United States Magistrate Judge:

Before the court is motion to compel by the plaintiffs. DE[16 & 18]. It is opposed by the defendant. DE[17]. The motion is GRANTED on the terms set forth infra.

The plaintiffs report that, on November 14, 2011, they served the defendants by mail and fax with their Requests for Documents, Interrogatories and Requests for Admission, and that no responses had been received as of the date of the motion—February 8, 2012—despite a telephone call to defense counsel on January 23, 2012. The plaintiff asks that the defendant be compelled to respond, that the…