Joseph v. Malinauskas v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge:
Joseph V. Malinauskas, appellant, unsuccessfully sought relief in the District Court under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, contending that his prior guilty plea of having violated the federal bank robbery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2113, was invalid upon essentially two grounds: (1) that he was mentally incompetent to plead guilty; and (2) that he was under the influence of drugs at the time of the plea. 1
This appeal presents a question of law which has not previously been answered by this Court. We must determine the proper criteria for assessing the degree of mental competence…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Terry Allen Bouchillon v. James A. Collins, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Ballard v. SpradleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Nelida RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Donald A. Allard v. Raymond A. HelgemoeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.