Legal Opinion

Donald A. Allard v. Raymond A. Helgemoe

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 3, 1978No. 77-1312PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Chief Judge.

Petitioner was indicted and charged with the crime of burglary and pleaded guilty to that offense in February, 1974. He was advised by experienced counsel at the time he entered his plea. At the proceeding petitioner signed an “Acknowledgement of Rights”, but the trial judge did not explain the elements of the offense of burglary to him nor did his attorney indicate that he had thoroughly discussed the charge with the defendant. After the plea was accepted but before the imposition of sentence, petitioner’s attorney recited to the court petitioner’s view of the facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gilbert F. Sieling, Sr. v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Ciummei v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. McGuirkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Bill Hugo Williams v. Donald E. Bordenkircher, Supt., Kentucky State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. State v. FaragiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API