People v. Baird
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the circumstantial evidence was not legally sufficient to support his conviction of arson in the second degree (Penal Law § 150.15). Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to the People and granting it all reasonable inferences (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437) we conclude that a valid line of reasoning existed to sustain the jury verdict (see, People v Flick, 147 AD2d 957, lv denied 73 NY2d 921; People v Sundholm, 105 AD2d 1072; People v Feuerstein, 74 AD2d 853). Defendant further contends that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. LeontiNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. DylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. FeuersteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- People v. ShemackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.