Department of Human Services v. N. T.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
Mother and father appeal from juvenile court judgments changing the permanency plans for their two children, “Mu” and “Me,” from reunification to adoption. They each contend that the court erred in (1) concluding that the Department of Human Services (DHS) had made reasonable efforts to reunify the family; (2) concluding that mother had not made sufficient progress to enable the children to return home; 1 and (3) relying on facts “extrinsic to the jurisdictional judgment” in changing the plans. In addition, mother asserts that the court erred in denying her request for a 60-day extension of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. S. T. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Department of Human Services v. G.E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. K. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. C. D. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
3Cited by28 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. S. M. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Department of Human Services v. G. N.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Department of Human Services v. S. S.Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- Department of Human Services v. T.L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Department of Human Services v. J. R. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.