Legal Opinion
Rudo v. McHugh
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 20, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2009-2172PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.
Babatu Rudo 1 (“Plaintiff’ or “Rudo”), a former service member in the United States Army (“Army”), brings this action pursuant to the Administrative Procedure’ Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq. and the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause against John McHugh (“Defendant”), Secretary of the Army, challenging the Army Board for Correction of Military Records’ (“ABCMR” or “Board”) decision regarding the characterization of his discharge from the Army.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKoy v. SpencerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Huffman v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Baxley v. WormuthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024