Legal Opinion
Baxley v. Wormuth
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 26, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2021-2245Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL C. BAXLEY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-2245 (TSC) CHRISTINE WORMUTH, et. al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael Baxley, a former member of the U.S. Army, challenges the Army Board for Corrections of Military Records’ (“Board”) decision not to upgrade his “Under Honorable Conditions (General)” discharge to an Honorable discharge. Plaintiff contends the agency’s decision violated the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Having considered the administrative record, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.