Legal Opinion

McQueen v. Babcock

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1867PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrover, J.

The General Term correctly held that the defendant had the right to serye an amended answer twenty days after service of the original, and to include therein a new defense. (Code, § 172; 11 How. [273] 18th ed. 274.) This is now the settled practice of the Supreme Court. The idea that the defense of usury or of the statute of limitations, was to be treated in this respect different from other defenses, has been exploded. Courts now regard all legal defenses as entitled in this respect to the same consideration. The question in this case was not addressed to the favor or discretion of the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Diamond v. Williamsburgh InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1873
  2. Gilchrist v. Gilchrist's ExecutorsNew York Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Divine v. DuncanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877
  4. Jennings v. KosmakAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  5. Van Wagonen v. . TerpenningNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API