Legal Opinion

Divine v. Duncan

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 15, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarremore, J.

Charles B. Carroll, in 1867, brought suit against Noah L. Wilson, David Gibson and Wm. L. Roelofson, composing .the firm of Wilson, Gibson & Co., to recover upon a joint liability for the purchase and sale of cotton. Carroll had purchased and paid $50,000 for an interest, and was to share in the profits and losses of the transaction. He avers that large quantities of cotton had been bought and sold, and prays for an accounting in the premises, and for judgment for the amount found due him. Defendants answered, admitting plaintiff’s interest, their readiness to account, and pleading…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Voorhis v. . Childs'New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Brown v. . LeighNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Richter v. . PoppenhausenNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Van Riper v. PoppenhausenNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  5. Goddard v. BensonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. Chaddock v. ChaddockNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Mussinan v. HattonThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894
  4. Mussinan v. HattonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API