Legal Opinion

Gilchrist v. Gilchrist's Executors

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBockes, J.

Motion for leave to serve an amended answer, setting up, among other defenses, "the statute of limitations.

It is pretty much a matter of course to permit parties to amend their pleadings before trial, when the amendment will produce no delay of the trial, nor work any especial hardship to the adverse party. This is now the settled rulings of the courts (see Wait’s Code, remarks and authorities, cited under section 173 of the Code). And the terms imposed are usually payment • of the costs of the motion, and such other costs and expenses, if any, as the party will lose by reason of the desired…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wagner v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. Beach v. President of the Fulton BankCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
  3. Catlin v. . GunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Jackson v. VarickNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  5. Sheldon v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1863

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Phœnix InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Grother v. Trustees of New York & Brooklyn BridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Inhabitants of West Hoboken v. SymsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
  4. Arnold v. ChesebroughU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1887
  5. Mason v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API