Legal Opinion

State v. Carrel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1921No. 17166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

Epitomized Opinion

1. Schultz seeks a writ of mandamus commanding Carrel to certify petitions for referendum to the Board of Deputy State Supervisors and Inspectors of Elections. From a consideration of the findings of the master herein appointed, the Supreme Court held:

1. There was not a sufficient number of valid signatures attached to the various petitions to authorize the referendum sought. Writ denied.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Toulmin, Jr. v. BeckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1952