Legal Opinion
State v. Carrel
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1921No. 17166PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
Epitomized Opinion
1. Schultz seeks a writ of mandamus commanding Carrel to certify petitions for referendum to the Board of Deputy State Supervisors and Inspectors of Elections. From a consideration of the findings of the master herein appointed, the Supreme Court held:
1. There was not a sufficient number of valid signatures attached to the various petitions to authorize the referendum sought. Writ denied.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Toulmin, Jr. v. BeckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1952