Legal Opinion

Toulmin, Jr. v. Becker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1952No. 2191PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By WISEMAN, J:

Submitted on application of plaintiff-appellant to refer this cause to a referee. The defendant-appellee opposes the application on the ground that the Court of Appeals has no statutory or inherent authority to make such reference.

The case is one in chancery and is in this Court on an appeal on questions of law and fact.

There is no statute which expressly confers the authority on the Court of Appeals to refer a chancery matter to a referee. In §12223-21 GC, it is provided that: “An appeal taken on questions of law and fact shall entitle the party to a hearing and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Atty. Gen. v. WeadOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. CarrelOhio Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bd. of Mental Retardation v. Association of Cuyahoga County Teachers of the Trainable RetardedOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaulOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Weier v. ThorneOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API