Legal Opinion

Bouknight v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 3, 1925No. 11825PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an action upon two promissory notes, aggregating $191.18, executed by the defendant to the plaintiff under the following circumstances: Mr. Bouknight had upon his premises, during the year 1920, a colored tenant by the name of Capers Hall. Towards the close of the year, Hall decided to leave Mr. Bouknight’s place' and applied to Dr. Mitchell, opening negotiations with him looking to farming a part of his land during the year 1921. Hall had a horse, a mule, a cow, the seed of 7 bales of cotton, 30 or 40 bushels of corn, 300…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meyer v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Planter's Bank v. Lummus Cotton Gin Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. Hall v. James T. Latimer & SonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Wait v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  5. Peoples Bank v. SpeegleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  2. Carolina Housing & Mortgage Corp. v. Orange Hill A. M. E. ChurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Prince v. MathewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API