Legal Opinion

Carolina Housing & Mortgage Corp. v. Orange Hill A. M. E. Church

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 4, 1957No. 17256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

The original complaint of the respondent alleges that on April 8, 1953, Orange Hill A. M. E. Church, by Sidney Butler and Samuel Gooden, Trustees, and as individuals, executed and delivered to J. W. Glasser, doing business as Aluminum Products Company, a promissory note in the sum of $2,338.92, payable in stated monthly installments. It is further alleged that in order to secure the payment of said note so executed and delivered, that Orange Hill A. M. E. Church executed and delivered a real estate mortgage creating a lien upon the church property. It is further alleged that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rouse v. Wooten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Georgian Company v. BrittonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Jh Ellen, Jr. v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v. WindhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Trustees of Broaddus Institute v. SiersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carsten v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. General Elec. Credit Corp. v. Air Flow Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. CresCom Bank v. Edward L. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. Singleton v. SingletonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API