Legal Opinion

Kashimiri v. Perales

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 21, 1984No. 84 Civ. 7680 (SWK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

The .above-captioned action is before this Court upon plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Montasham Ali Kashimiri is a resident of New York State who apparently owns and/or operates twelve pharmacies located in Kings, New York, Queens, and Richmond Counties. 1 The other ten plain tiffs 2 are domestic corporations that operate eleven of those pharmacies. 3 Each of the plaintiffs is enrolled in the New…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Siddiqui v. New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Rockland Medilabs, Inc. v. PeralesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Senape v. ConstantinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Karanja v. PeralesNew York Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API