Kashimiri v. Perales
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
The .above-captioned action is before this Court upon plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Montasham Ali Kashimiri is a resident of New York State who apparently owns and/or operates twelve pharmacies located in Kings, New York, Queens, and Richmond Counties. 1 The other ten plain tiffs 2 are domestic corporations that operate eleven of those pharmacies. 3 Each of the plaintiffs is enrolled in the New…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Siddiqui v. New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Rockland Medilabs, Inc. v. PeralesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Senape v. ConstantinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Karanja v. PeralesNew York Supreme Court · 1988