Legal Opinion

Rockland Medilabs, Inc. v. Perales

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 18, 1989No. 89 Civ. 4205 (GLG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge:

Reacting to the advent and growth of the welfare state, the Supreme Court pronounced in 1972 that “the property interests protected by procedural due process extend well beyond actual ownership of real estate, chattels, or money.” Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 571-72, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2706, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). See also Reich, Individual Rights and Social Welfare: The Emerging Legal Issues, 74 Yale L.J. 1245 (1965); Reich, The New Property, 73 Yale L.J. 733 (1964). Consistent with Roth, a whole range of government benefits and awards comprising what…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vialez v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Yorktown Medical Laboratory, Inc. v. PeralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. Finch ex rel. Moe v. New York State Office of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  4. Senape v. ConstantinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. Gellman v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API