Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Jefferson Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1878PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. If, owing to the fact that the trustee was also the appellant’s secretary, the company is to be treated as a mortgagee buying at its own sale, the respondent has the right to redeem, and nothing more. — Landrum v. Union Bank, 63 Mo. 48; Gooden.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. If, owing to the fact that the trustee was also the appellant’s secretary, the company is to be treated as a mortgagee buying at its own sale, the respondent has the right to redeem, and nothing more. — Landrum v. Union Bank, 63 Mo. 48; Gooden. Comfort, 39 Mo. 327 ; Allen v. Ransom, 44 Mo. 263 ; Red-dick v. Gressman, 49 Mo. 389 ; Thornton v. Irvin, 43 Mo. 153; McKees v. Swaney, 50 Mo. 388. Mere inadequacy of consideration, unaccompanied by proof of fraud, unfairness, or collusion, is no ground for setting aside a sale. — Stoffel v. Schroeder, 62 Mo. 147 ;…

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

Meyer, who is the assignee of Heinicke, under a voluntary assignment for the benefit of creditors, made under the laws of this State, filed his bill in equity to set aside a sale under a deed of trust. The bill alleges that Heinicke and his wife conveyed to Eritsch, in trust, to secure an indebtedness *248to the Jefferson Insurance Company, a lot on Main Street, near Chestnut Street, in St. Louis, having a front of twenty-two feet, on which was erected a four-story stone-front building, owned by Heinicke; the principal note was dated July 3, 1874, payable five years after date, and there were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richards v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Stoffel v. SchroederSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Stine v. WilksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1846
  4. Judge v. BoogeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  5. Harper v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Humboldt Sav. Bank v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Linney v. NormoyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Pacific Ready-Cut Homes, Inc. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Lunsford v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Lange v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API