Legal Opinion
Linney v. Normoyle
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 23, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This was a suit instituted by the appellees to compel the appellant to account for the proceeds resulting from a sale of the property of M. F. Normoyle and wife, by W. E. Henson, trustee, at which sale the appellant became the purchaser.
*591It appears that appellant was administrator of A. L. Sibert, deceased, and on November 4, 1917, a note for $2,000, executed by M. F. Normoyle and Sons, payable to Sibert, became due. The sons of Normoyle having volunteered for service in the World War, a new note was executed by M. F. Normoyle, payable to Linney, administrator, and guaranteed on the back…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Rohrer v. StricklandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
- Vail v. JacobsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Briggs v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Meyer v. Jefferson InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
3Cited by15 opinions
- Golden v. TomiyasuNevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Feldman v. RuckerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Whitlow v. Mountain Trust BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Maplewood InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Commonwealth Federal Savings Bank v. Maplewood Investments, a Virginia General Partnership James D. Heatwole, Ruby A. Heatwole Nathan H. Miller Kimberly H. Miller, Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Commonwealth Federal Savings Bank v. Maplewood Investments, a Virginia General Partnership James D. Heatwole, Ruby A. Heatwole Nathan H. Miller Kimberly H. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.