Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of McLean

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 27, 1980No. 22127, CA 15295PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.

Husband appeals from the court’s order in a modification proceeding denying his motion for elimination of his spousal support obligation. Under the dissolution decree entered in April, 1978, he was to pay $300 monthly permanent spousal support. On appeal we agreed that permanent support was appropriate but modified the amount to $250 per month. McLean and McLean, 36 Or App 809, 585 P2d 750 (1978).

Modification of a spousal support obligation is appropriate only when a substantial change of circumstances has occurred which could not have reasonably been expected at the time of the decree.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Briggs v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Abraham v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Ward v. WardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Hellweg v. HellwegCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Walker v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BruneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. In re the Marriage of McDonnalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. In re the Marriage of HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. In re the Marriage of SlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API