In re the Marriage of Brune
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Husband seeks to terminate his $400 per month spousal support obligation. The trial court refused to modify the decree on the ground that husband failed to show a significant change of circumstances. The issue is whether wife’s remarriage and economic arrangements with her present husband constitute a change of circumstances sufficient to justify termination.1 We review de novo. ORS 19.125(3).
The decree of dissolution, entered in November, 1976, ended the parties’ 29 year marriage, when they were both 47 years old. Wife was awarded all of the parties’ real and personal property, with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Unander v. UnanderOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Phy v. PhyOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Nelson v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Marriage of WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- In re the Marriage of BatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- In re the Marriage of WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983