Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of McDonnal

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1981No. D9229, CA 18841PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Husband appeals from an order modifying the provisions of a 1977 dissolution decree which provided spousal support for three years. In 1980, wife filed a motion to modify the decree, asking that spousal support be increased and made permanent. The trial court allowed wife’s motion. The issues are: (1) was it proper for the trial court to extend spousal support, and (2) was it proper for the trial court to increase spousal support? We review de novo and reverse. ORS 19.125(3).

The essential facts are not in dispute. The parties were married in 1959. Two children were born of the marriage.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of KitsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. Feves v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In re the Marriage of SlausonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of DelfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Ward v. WardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Staveland and FisherOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API