Legal Opinion

Bland v. Greenfield Gin Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1944No. 4831PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THREET, Justice.

Appellee, Willie Mae Bland, brought suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, N.M.S.A. 1941, § 57-901 et seq., for the death of her husband, William Halsey Bland, against appellants, the Greenfield Gin Company, a corporation, and the Maryland Casualty Company, insurer. From a judgment in favor of appellee appellants appeal, assigning errors to-wit:

1. The court erred in its findings of fact Nos. 3 and 4 and refusing to adopt appellants’ requested finding of fact No. 5.

2. The court erred in its findings of fact Nos. 1 and 2 and refusing to adopt appellants’ requested finding of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  2. Burruss v. B. M. C. Logging Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  3. De Palma v. WeinmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Manby v. VoorheesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Meredosia Levee & Drainage District v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Scott v. Murphy CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Shipman v. MacCo CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Harger v. Structural Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Campbell v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Southern Union Gas Co. v. CantrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API