Stewart v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
This defendant was charged by indictment with the offense of seduction.
On October 31, 1921, the case was called for trial, both sides announced ready, whereupon before proceeding further the court ex mero motu ordered the courtroom cleared, and announced that no one would be allowed in the courtroom, during the trial, except those necessary to the trial of the case, and the public was accordingly excluded from the courtroom during the whole trial.
Section 6, Constitution 1901, provides, among other things, that in all prosecutions by indictment the accused shall have “a speedy, public trial,”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wade v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Wade v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Ex Parte WadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. JelkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- People v. ByrnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hull v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- State v. BonzaUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.