Legal Opinion

Hull v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 30, 1936No. 3 Div. 154PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Appellant was indicted for carnal knowledge of, or abuse in the attempt to carnally know, a girl under twelve years of age.

There was a jury and a verdict of guilty, as charged in the indictment, and punishment fixed at death.

The evidence tended to show that on several occasions defendant attempted to complete the act in question with the girl mentioned in the indictment, and that she was about nine years of age. The evidence for the state further showed that defendant induced said child to engage in such practices with him by giving her presents and showing her lewd pictures,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Knowles v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Richards v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Wade v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gast v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Autry v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Vandiver v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API