Legal Opinion
Martin v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1923No. 6 Div. 210PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.
The defendant, appellant, was indicte'd, tried, and convicted of seduction. At common law the woman was considered particeps criminis. in an offense of this kind, and the man was not punished criminally for his participation in the joint delinquency.
“But in the process of time, experience, and a more enlightened public, sentiment showed that in many instances unmarried females of chaste character needed the protection of the strong arm of the law to shield-them in their innocency from the lustful machinations of evil-disposed men, who resorted to' the blandishments of courtship and false…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beggs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Farley v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Chambers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Shadix v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Armstrong v. State Ex Rel. EmbrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Ray v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Scott v. Bd. of Trustees of Mobile SSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.