Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Hamilton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2000No. 1999-2269PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 330.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. HAMILTON. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Hamilton,

2000-Ohio-349.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Misappropriation of client funds. (No. 99-2269—Submitted February 9, 2000—Decided March 29, 2000.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 99-34. __________________ {¶ 1} From 1990 until November 1998, respondent, Charles E. Hamilton of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney

Registration No. 0016941,

maintained a part-time…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. HamiltonOhio Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API