Legal Opinion

Mulberry v. O'Dea

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1906No. Civ. No. 260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, J. (Pro tem).

Plaintiffs are severally the owners of parcels of real property in the city of Los Angeles against which liens are claimed under certain proceedings taken by the city for the improvement of Temple street. Defendant Tryon-Brain Company, a corporation, was the contractor, and performed the work of laying cement sidewalks and building cement curbs along certain portions of said street. Upon completion of the work the rights of defendant company under their contract were assigned to defendant O ’Dea. Certain irregularities in the proceedings taken by the city and alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Brown v. JenksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Blochman v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. City of Los Angeles v. WaldronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Alameda MacAdamizing Co. v. PringleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bernheim v. Town of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API