Legal Opinion
Farrakhan v. Locke
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided November 13, 1997No. CS-96-076-RHWPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND
WHALEY, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Dismissal for Failure to State a Claim (Ct.Ree.53) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for. Leave to Amend (Ct.Rec.66). A hearing was held in this matter on October 17, 1997. Dennis Cronin, Larry Weiser, Angel Rains, and George Vourvoulias appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs, Daniel Judge and Jeffrey Even appeared on behalf of Defendants.
As explained below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted as to Plaintiffs’ claims…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Farrakhan v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Farrakhan v. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Farrakhan v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hand,et al v. Scott,et alCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Johnson v. Governor of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.