Legal Opinion
State v. Pidcock
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 1988No. CC 10-85-09438; CA A40456; SC S34991PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Defendant appealed his convictions on two counts of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4) (b), contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. The Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Pidcock, 89 Or App 443, 749 P2d 597 (1988). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
FACTS
The Court of Appeals recited the stipulated facts of the parties as follows:
“On February 14,1985, a Mrs. Joll and her daughter Mary were driving toward their residence, just off Crow Road, in Lane County. As they approached the mailbox adjacent to their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. PidcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WilliamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- AFSCME Local 2623 v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. KealeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.