Legal Opinion

State v. Flores

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1995No. 841-94PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

The trial court granted appellee’s motion to quash the first paragraph of the indictment charging him with involuntary manslaughter because it failed to allege the form of intoxicant the State intended to prove at trial. The State appealed and the Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Flores, 878 S.W.2d 651 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1994). The State filed a petition for discretionary review, contending the Court of Appeals’ opinion conflicts with this Court’s opinion in Garcia v. State, 747 S.W.2d 379 (Tex.Crim. App.1988). The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Saathoff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. State v. Flores, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stadt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. State v. McCoy, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  4. Candy Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  5. Eric T. Blews v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API