Legal Opinion

State v. Flores

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 9, 1994No. 13-93-084-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Daniel Flores’ motion to quash an indictment charging him with involuntary manslaughter. By two points of error, the State asserts that the trial court erred in quashing the indictment. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

A grand jury indicted Flores for the offense of involuntary manslaughter. The two paragraphs of the indictment read in pertinent parts as follow:

[Flores] did then and there by accident and mistake when operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and by reason of such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Crume v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. State v. Moreno, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stadt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. State v. McCoy, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  4. State v. FloresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Candy Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API