Legal Opinion

Saathoff v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1994No. 1463-93PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

The issue before this Court is whether an indictment alleging involuntary manslaughter under V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 19.05(a)(2), 1 must specify which definition of intoxication the State intends to prove at trial. 2 The trial court denied Appellant’s motion to quash, by which he sought notice of the type of intoxication the State would seek to prove. 3 A jury convicted Appellant of involuntary manslaughter and the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for seven years, probated. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction after…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Drumm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. State v. CarterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by46 opinions

  1. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. State v. BarbernellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. St. Clair v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API