Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Hildebrand
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 9, 2001No. 77483PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Terrence O’Donnell, Judge.
On December 3, 1997, a common pleas court jury returned a $70,000 verdict in favor of Kenneth Cunningham in connection with his claims for legal malpractice against John P. Hildebrand, Hildebrand, Williams & Farrell, Norman A. Fox, and the law firm of Fox & Coury. Subsequent to that verdict, the trial court, finding that the jury had reached a verdict “inconsistent and irreconcilable with the evidence submitted at trial,” and had “returned answers to interrogatories which are both inconsistent and irreconcilable with the general verdict,” entered judgment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Campbell v. PMI Food Equipment Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Fabec v. Frederick & Berler, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Wyczalek v. Rowe Construction Services Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Amanda Sima v. Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026
- Campbell v. PMI Food EquipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.