Legal Opinion

Braddock Iron Mining Co. v. Erskine

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 23, 1923No. 23,320PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

This is an action brought by 23 mining companies to enjoin the county auditor and treasurer of Itasca county, from apportioning and distributing among the school- districts of the county, the proceeds of the so-called ten mill school tax levied, during 1921, on both real and personal property, under chapter 271, p. 282, Laws of 1919.

The complaint alleges that each of the plaintiffs separately owns property in the county, that each of plaintiffs owning personal property in the county paid its 1921 personal property tax before March 1, 1922, and each of plaintiff's owning real estate in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fairley v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Falvey v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Wall v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adelman v. OnischukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Pettibone v. Cook County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  3. Horn v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Sloan v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Weberling v. BursellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API