Legal Opinion

People v. Murieta

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1934No. Crim. 2573PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant was convicted on each of three counts of robbery and on each of three counts of kidnaping. He appeals from the ensuing judgment, as well as from the order by which his motion for a new trial was denied.

In his brief appellant states the point upon which he relies for a reversal of the judgment as follows:

“The appeal herein is based solely upon the [in]sufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdicts. It is submitted that each of the verdicts rendered is against the evidence and the weight of evidence.”

However, an examination of his brief discloses the fact that, specifically,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. FiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. People v. McClainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. SpillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. ElledgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. MastrantuonoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API