Legal Opinion

People v. Mastrantuono

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1948No. Crim. No. 692PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

Defendant having been convicted of statutory rape and violation of section 288a of the Penal Code, appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for new trial. His contention is that the verdicts of the jury are not supported by the evidence.

The information contained six counts: count one charged statutory rape; count two: violation of section 288a of the Penal Code; count three: violation of section 286; count four: violation of section 288a; count five: violation of section 286, and count six: violation of section 288 of the same code. During the trial, on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. CollierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. BiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. BrickmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. People v. RisleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API