Legal Opinion

Hulsebus v. Russian

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 19, 1969No. Gen. 69-48PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff, a minor, brought suit against both defendants as a result of an automobile accident wherein he was injured while riding as a passenger in one of the three vehicles involved. The jury returned a verdict finding the defendant Thompson guilty and assessed damages in the sum of $25,000 but found the defendant Russian, not guilty. The trial court denied the plaintiff’s motion against the defendant Russian for a judgment n. o. v. or, in the alternative, a new trial. The plaintiff appeals from the order of denial only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Saunders v. SchultzIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Mount v. McClellanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Hitt v. LangelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lebrecht v. TuliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Carnation Company v. WongTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ritter v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Stach v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Heiser v. ChastainAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API