Acosta v. Central Laundry, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 82-1) of the order granting Defendants’ Motion in Limine (ECF No. 74) to preclude the lay testimony of Wage and Hour Investigator (“WHI”).. Jennifer Azeles. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
This case concerns violations of the Fair, Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. On March 24, 2015, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants, alleging extensive FLSA violations. Defendants have admitted liability, conceding to a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Max's Seafood Cafe, ex rel. Lou-Ann, Inc. v. QuinterosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Citizen Developer, LLC v. System Soft Technologies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- DEPALMA v. THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- KLOSTERMAN v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- LONTEX CORPORATION v. NIKE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- MCCOWAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.