Legal Opinion
Max's Seafood Cafe, ex rel. Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 5, 1999No. 98-5287PublishedCited by 149 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
Max Quinteros and Jack-Mack Seafood, LLC (“Jack-Mack”) appeal from the District Court’s order holding them in civil contempt for violations of a consent order to which Quinteros was a party. Quinte-ros urges that the District Court erred in holding him liable for Frank Miraglia’s violations of that consent order. The other appellant, JackMack, complains that because it was not in existence at the time of the contumacious acts in question, the District Court erred in holding it in contempt. We consider their contentions in turn.
II
BACKGROU…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Alston v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Bryan Santini v. Joseph FuentesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- In Re Energy Future Holdings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. DupreeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Milad Allaham v. Fadi NaddafCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.