Legal Opinion
Clark v. Belleau, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 28, 1966No. 42154, 42165PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
1. The original petition brought by the subcontractor, Ered N. Clark, against the contractor-owner, Belleau, Inc., sought recovery for the removal of dirt under a grading contract, and for the removal of certain “muck” as an extra arising out of the performance of a contract to install a drainage system. Copies of the contracts were attached to the petition. An oral motion to strike the various allegations relating to the claim for removal of the muck was overruled and no enumeration of error was made thereon in this court. An amendment was offered to the petition merely…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Highway Department v. Wright Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Strong v. PalmourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Heard v. Dooly CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Bailey v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- State Highway Department v. Hewitt Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brookhaven Landscape & Grading Co., Inc. v. J. F. Barton Contracting Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Excavators & Erectors, Inc. v. Bullard Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Reeves v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Biltmore Construction Co. v. Tri-State Electrical Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Foskey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.