Legal Opinion
Strong v. Palmour
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 26, 1966No. 41973PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhakdt, Judge.
The first two enumerations of error are as to the charge of Code Ann. § 68-1650 (a) and the third is as to the charge of § 39 of the DeKalb ordinance, which is the same, in substance, as the Code section.
These enumerations are meritorious. It is conceded that Til-son Road is a through street and that as plaintiff approached the intersection she was faced with a stop sign at the intersection.
It is provided in Code Ann. § 68-1650 (d) that “The right of way rules declared in subdivisions (a) and (b) are modified at through highways and otherwise as hereinafter stated in Sections…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Morris v. WarlickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Teague v. KeithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Tyson v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Richardson v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stubbs v. DaughtryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Yandle v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Humphreys v. KipfmillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Saint v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Clark v. Belleau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.