Legal Opinion

Gustof Charles Feyers and Gabrielle Feyers v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1984No. 83-1402PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from a judgment rendered by the district court in favor of appellees Gustof and Gabrielle Feyers pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680, on appellees’ claims alleging negligent inspection of, and failure to provide safety training in, the railyard where Gustof Feyers was injured. Since we conclude that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand with instructions to dismiss.

I

Feyers was injured on April 24, 1976 while attempting to couple two United States…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Anna Carlyle, Guardian of the Estate of Henry Robinson, Jr. v. United States of America, Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Rosebush v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Irene H. Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Milligan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Myslakowski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API