Legal Opinion
Jaimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 2002No. 00CA0042PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROY. |
Plaintiff, Ignacio Jaimes (insured), appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (insurer). We reverse and remand.
In Jaimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., (Colo.App. No. 00CA0042, Mar. 29, 2001)(not selected for official publication), we addressed the validity of the exclusion in a motor vehicle insurance policy limiting coverages, including uninsured/un-derinsured (UM/UIM) coverage, to insured's injuries while occupying a vehicle insured under that policy. We concluded that the exclusion was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- DeHerrera Ex Rel. DeHerrera v. Sentry Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Arguello v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. BenzingSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Bernal v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. PourierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. AndersonColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.