Legal Opinion

De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. Pourier

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2011No. 25783PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] An insured was seriously injured in an automobile accident, suffering damages in excess of $250,000. After receiving $25,000 from the tortfeasor’s liability carrier and $100,000 in underinsured motorist coverage from her primary insurer, she sought an additional $100,000 in underin-sured coverage from her excess carrier. But the excess carrier denied coverage, asserting that an exclusion in the policy *448precluded coverage. On cross motions for summary judgment, the circuit court declared that the excess carrier’s exclusion was valid and enforceable. Because the policy…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kobbeman v. OlesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Deel v. SweeneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lemars Mutual Insurance Co. v. JofferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. Cimarron Insurance Co. v. CroyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Kau v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Swenson v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Wheeler v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. of NebraskaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Swenson v. Owners Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. Gateway Building Systems, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Larimer v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API