Legal Opinion
Holderbaum v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 1990No. 89-1384PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
On this petition for review of an order denying petitioner disability retirement from the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), we conclude that a remand to the administrative board is necessary for findings concerning the statutory issue of whether petitioner was “disabled for useful and efficient service in the grade or class of position last occupied by” him. D.C. Code § 4-607(2) (1988).
*214I.
Petitioner was appointed to the MPD in July 1968. His problems leading up to his request for disability retirement began in September 1970 when he was assaulted while on duty at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coakley v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Seabolt v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Proulx v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Martin v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wells v. Police & Firefighter's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DiVincenzo v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Holderbaum v. POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS R&R BD.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990