Legal Opinion

Fox v. Government of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-2118PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Barbara Fox and Hamilton P. Fox, III brought this action against two Metropolitan Police Department officers in their individual capacities and the District of Columbia [Dkt. # 15]. They allege eight causes of action arising from a dispute between Mr. Fox and the officers that ultimately led to Mr. Fox’s arrest for disorderly conduct and his release pursuant to a “post-and-forfeit” procedure whereby an arrestee simultaneously posts and forfeits collateral in return for his release from jail without prosecution. Five of the claims…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. FentyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Beg Investments, LLC v. AlbertiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Patrick Kincaid v. Government of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  4. Cannon v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Fox v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API