James Conley v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Inst.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner James M. Conley seeks habe-as relief from his conviction in Ohio state court for aggravated burglary. Conley challenges a witness’s in-court identification of him and contends that his prosecu-torial-misconduct claims are not procedurally defaulted. The Ohio Court of Appeals concluded that the witness’s in-court identification was reliable, and held that because Conley did not object to the alleged misconduct at trial, he waived all but plain error review. Because Conley has failed to establish that the pretrial procedure was unduly suggestive and that the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cook v. Warden Noble Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Culer v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Fetherolf v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Johnathan Barnes v. Warden, North Central Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Johnson v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.